yiqicao17c@gmail.com
添加时间：
前不久，据36氪报道，仅入职半年的OYO酒店对外事务总裁付小明已经离职。报道中提到此次离任由付小明主动提出，与派系斗争有关。在脉脉上，有OYO酒店的员工指出，在入职之后发现OYO内部存在“阿里系、神州租车系、摩拜系、ofo系、滴滴系等……各占山头，派系林立。”
下一步需要解决的问题，法律问题、监管问题、协同问题、安全问题，各个层次都有很多未解的问题，在座各位如果感兴趣，继续在区块链这个领域做一定的继续的发展，我也希望大家能够做一些更多的原创性的研究工作，不要去重复人家已经说过1千遍的理论和概念，其实区块链我们目前认为，尤其它在底层，物理层、链路层需要做的很多工作都是空白，是一个漫长的过程，我觉得会有一定的时间。
短期均线5日均线并未缩减向上延伸的步伐，目前已经串过10日均线，在1195附近形成一道关键支撑，上方暂时受压于布林带中轨及30日均线1199附近，布林带上下轨再次呈现一个走平状态。附图指标，macd双线继续保持0轴附近，金叉运行，红能放量并不严重；sto双线也保持金叉向上延伸，目前处于50轴上方，稍有放缓。可以说目前日线上，依然以震荡偏强看待。只有下方再次下破5日均线，才可能让这一走势处于偏弱。
数据统计，截至上午收盘，今日沪指涨幅-0.82%，A股成交量184.56亿股，成交金额2076.80亿元，比上一个交易日增14.92%。个股方面，2229只个股上涨，其中非ST股涨停43只，964只个股下跌，其中非ST股跌停15只。从申万行业来看，计算机、国防军工、通信等涨幅最大，涨幅分别为3.49%、2.01%、1.45%；钢铁、房地产、建筑材料等跌幅最大，跌幅分别为3.47%、3.23%、2.40%。
免责声明：自媒体综合提供的内容均源自自媒体，版权归原作者所有，转载请联系原作者并获许可。文章观点仅代表作者本人，不代表新浪立场。若内容涉及投资建议，仅供参考勿作为投资依据。投资有风险，入市需谨慎。责任编辑：王涵再融资松绑的火苗，正在逐渐点燃并购重组市场。
Simon：Personally I don’t think that the new regulation makes sense． But it reflects the mood of the politicians， the industry and probably the majority of Germans． In my opinion the German government should focus on creating a level playing field for German and foreign companies in China rather than impeding foreign and Chinese investments in Germany． I do not expect that the new rules will have much impact． There are some critical areas like infrastructure or defense where such restrictions are understandable and make sense， but for 90% of the economy they are nonsense． But I have also to criticize the Chinese． We have seen 162 acquisitions of German companies by Chinese investors in the last three years， in the opposite direction we had 32． This imbalance in the numbers as such is not a problem． The problem is rather that some of the Chinese takeovers were seen as rather aggressive and as coordinated within the “Made in China 2025”- initiative． I think that the aggressive communication of that campaign has done damage to Chinese investments abroad． Yes， China has been very successful． But I would recommend the country to boast less about this success and the ensuing strength． Chinese acquirers have often payed very high prices． While this may be advantageous for the seller， it is not perceived well by politics and the public． Why？ Because overly high prices create the suspicion that these are political rather than pure business acquisitions．
